Harry Litman: “From the vantage level of the prosecution, the authorized necessities of the hush cash fee and alleged fabrication of paperwork don’t activate whether or not the jury believes Daniels. Certainly, quite a lot of analysts prompt the district legal professional would have been higher off not calling her in any respect.”
“What that evaluation overlooks, nevertheless, is the jury’s pure want to take the measure of the girl who propelled the disaster and about whom that they had heard a lot. Not calling her risked leaving them questioning what the prosecution was hiding. Then again, if portion of the jury didn’t like Daniels or, worse, didn’t consider her, that might negatively affect their deliberations.”
“From Trump’s vantage level, the dangers are keener. That’s largely as a result of his vainness and vanity have compelled his attorneys to decide to an pointless insistence that he by no means had intercourse with Daniels. Consequently, if the jury credit the fundamentals of her story, it discredits Trump.”
“And it’s very exhausting to see how the jury may undertake Trump’s absolutist account, together with his declare that he met Daniels solely as soon as at a celeb golf match. For starters, the proof that they met a number of instances thereafter is mainly undisputed.”
